Gluten, Grains, Seeds, and Nuts... and the link to inflammatory disease.
Dear
Reader:
There
has been increasing awareness of gluten sensitivity such that the latest health
trend has been choosing gluten free products. It is not hard to find
advertisements and entire sections in the grocery being devoted to the trend
and it is curious to observe how the food industry is falling all over itself
trying to capture their corner of the market. The good news of all this is for the people
people who are truly gluten sensitive to now find a variety of suitable foods in
the grocery, without having to special order from the health food stores or
bring a carry-in bag to the restaurant. It’s becoming mainstream!
Depending
on the sources, there are some estimated 1-6% of people who are adversely sensitive
to gluten to the degree it creates clinical symptoms of gastric inflammation,
and for those people, avoiding gluten is a must. However, it seems to me that people
who are otherwise avoiding gluten have been doing so because it is trendy and
have had no real health reasons to do so … other than by avoiding gluten you also
avoid much of the tasty treats that make up our common empty and excessive
calories. Few of the trenders, it seems, have done any real
research to determine why they should otherwise avoid the evils of wheat and
its ilk.
Still…
I am aware of no few people who have gone on the gluten free kick and,
according to their reports, have never felt better! Placebo perhaps. Perhaps a coincident more
active awareness and selection of health promoting foods rather than empty
starchy calories? Perhaps mind over matter? Hmmm…
In
doing my own research, to be informed on the topic, and inspired by a patient
who was seeking answers to his own health concerns, it has come to my awareness
that not only gluten, but other proteins as well that that are found in all
grains, beans, seeds, and nuts … may have a more insidious and pervasive role
in many of the inflammatory disorders that seem to be becoming more common in
our western life.
I
am not saying that I am convinced that ages old wisdom of eating whole grains
and beans and lentils, and wholesome seeds and nuts has been wrong and perhaps
we ought to focus more on the fruits and leafy vegetables, and root veggies…. But
it does have my attention.
The gist of it, is that proteins in seeds, which includes grains, nuts, and beans
I
offer, therefore, several articles and sources that seem to me to a credible
investigation into gluten intolerance, celiac disease, non-gluten celiac
disease, general inflammatory diseases….. and why there may be some merit in a
seed free diet
All
credit to the originating authors and sources. If you like them… please
investigate further.
Best
regards,
Dr.
Wayne Coghlan
Collingwood
Chiropractor Clinic
Wayne Coghlan : A
graduate of the University of Guelph School of Human Biology, and the Canadian
Memorial Chiropractic
College. I have further education
in Sports Sciences, and completed a Master's degree in Counselling Psychology.
Played varsity sports – rugby and football. Worked my way through school doing
physical labour ... I know the realities of the work place. Gardening, canoe
trips, being a good parent and member of our community.
Questions/Comments/To
book and appoint:
or call me at 705
445-5401
"Gluten
Sensitivity" May Be a Misnomer for Distinct Illnesses to Various Wheat
Proteins
Gluten
may not be the only wheat protein that can make people sick
Feb 1, 2014
Two years ago, at the
recommendation of a nutritionist, I stopped eating wheat and a few other
grains. Within a matter of days the disabling headaches and fatigue that I had
been suffering for months vanished. Initially my gastroenterologist interpreted
this resolution of my symptoms as a sign that I perhaps suffered from celiac
disease, a peculiar disorder in which the immune system attacks a bundle of
proteins found in wheat, barley and rye that are collectively referred to as
gluten. The misdirected assault ravages and inflames the small intestine,
interfering with the absorption of vital nutrients and thereby causing
bloating, diarrhea, headaches, tiredness and, in rare cases, death. Yet several
tests for celiac disease had come back negative. Rather my doctors concluded
that I had nonceliac “gluten sensitivity,” a relatively new diagnosis. The
prevalence of gluten sensitivity is not yet clear, but some data suggest it may
afflict as many as 6 percent of Americans, six times the number of people with
celiac disease.
Although gluten sensitivity
and celiac disease share many symptoms, the former is generally less severe.
Compared with individuals with celiac disease, people with gluten sensitivity
are more likely to report nondigestive symptoms such as headaches and do not
usually suffer acute intestinal damage and inflammation. Lately, however, some
researchers are wondering if they were too quick to pin all the blame for these
problems on gluten. A handful of new studies suggest that in many cases gluten
sensitivity might not be about gluten at all. Rather it may be a misnomer for a
range of different illnesses triggered by distinct molecules in wheat and other
grains.
“You know the story of the
blind man and the elephant? Well, that's what gluten-sensitivity research is
right now,” says Sheila Crowe, head of research at the gastroenterology
division at the School of Medicine at the University of California , San Diego . As doctors continue to tease apart
the diverse ways that the human body reacts to all the proteins and other
molecules besides gluten that are found in grains, they will be able to develop
more accurate tests for various sensitivities to those compounds. Ultimately
clinicians hope such tests will help people who have a genuine medical
condition to avoid the specific constituents of grains that make them ill and
will stop others from unnecessarily cutting out nutrient-dense whole grains.
Seeds of Sickness
Among the most commonly consumed grains, wheat is the chief troublemaker.
Humans first domesticated the wheat plant about 10,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent in the Middle East . Since then, the amount of wheat in
our diet—along with all the molecules it contains—has dramatically increased.
Of all these molecules, gluten is arguably the most important to the quality of
bread because it gives baked goods their structure, texture and elasticity.
When bakers add water to wheat flour and begin to knead it into dough, two
smaller proteins—gliadin and glutenin—change shape and bind to each other,
forming long, elastic loops of what we call gluten. The more gluten in the
flour, the more the dough will stretch and the spongier it will be once baked.
Until the Middle Ages, the
types of grain that people cultivated contained far smaller amounts of gluten
than the crops we grow today. In the following centuries—even before people
understood what gluten was—they selectively bred varieties of wheat that
produced bread that was lighter and chewier, inexorably increasing consumption
of the protein. As technology for breeding and farming wheat improved,
Americans began to produce and eat more wheat overall. Today the average person
in the U.S. eats around 132 pounds of wheat a year—often in the form of bread,
cereal, crackers, pasta, cookies and cakes—which translates to about 0.8 ounce
of gluten each day.
Although historical records
dating from the first century a.d. mention a disorder that sounds a lot like
celiac disease, it was not until the mid-1900s that doctors realized the gluten
in wheat was to blame. During World War II, Dutch physician Willem-Karel Dicke
documented a sharp drop in the number of deaths among children with the
severest forms of celiac disease in parallel with a bread shortage. In a
follow-up study, researchers removed different components of wheat from the
diet of 10 children with the intestinal illness. Adding back gluten caused
symptoms such as diarrhea to resurface, but reintroducing a different complex
molecule found in wheat, namely starch, did not. Thus, gluten was shown to be
responsible for celiac disease.
Later experiments by other
researchers revealed which component of gluten provokes the immune system. When
digested, gluten splits back into gliadin and glutenin. For reasons that remain
unclear, the immune system of people with celiac disease treats gliadin in
particular as though it were a dangerous invader.
For years doctors used diet
to diagnose the gut disorder: if someone's symptoms disappeared on a
gluten-free diet, then that person had celiac disease. Over time, however,
clinicians developed more sophisticated ways to identify celiac disease, such
as tests that look for immune system molecules known as antibodies that
recognize and cling to gliadin. With the advent of such tests, clinicians soon
discovered that some people who became mildly ill after eating bread and pasta
did not in fact have celiac disease: biopsies revealed little or no intestinal
damage, and blood tests failed to find the same antibodies associated with the
disorder. In the process, the new condition became known as nonceliac gluten
sensitivity.
Now several studies hint
that so-called gluten sensitivity might not always be caused by gluten. In some
cases, the problem may be entirely different proteins—or even some
carbohydrates. “We're so used to dealing with gluten as the enemy, but it might
actually be something else,” says David Sanders, who teaches gastroenterology
at the University of Sheffield in England . Joseph Murray, a
gastroenterologist at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester , Minn. , agrees: “I'm starting to feel more
uncomfortable calling it nonceliac gluten sensitivity. I think it might be
better to call it nonceliac wheat sensitivity.”
Against the Grain
If the culprits behind certain instances of gluten sensitivity are, in fact,
wheat constituents other than gluten, finding the right ones will be difficult.
Wheat has six sets of chromosomes and a whopping 95,000 or so genes. In
comparison, we humans have just two sets of chromosomes and about 20,000 genes.
Genes code the instructions to build proteins, so more genes mean more proteins
to sift through. Some initial experiments have spotlighted a few potential
offenders, however.
In laboratory tests, wheat
proteins known as amylase-trypsin inhibitors have stimulated immune cells in
plastic wells to release inflammatory molecules called cytokines that can
overexcite the immune system. Further tests showed that these wheat proteins
provoked the same inflammatory response in mice. Likewise, in an Italian study,
small concentrations of wheat germ agglutinin, a protein distinct from gluten,
roused cytokines from human intestinal cells growing in a plastic well.
Preliminary research
suggests that, in other cases, by-products of gluten digestion may be the
problem. Breaking down gliadin and glutenin produces even shorter chains of
amino acids—the building blocks of proteins—some of which may behave like
morphine and other soporific opiates. Perhaps these molecules explain some of
the lethargy exhibited by people who do not have celiac disease but are
nonetheless sensitive to wheat, suggests Aristo Vojdani, chief executive
officer of Immunosciences Lab in Los Angeles. In a small study by Vojdani and
his colleagues, the blood of people classified as gluten-sensitive had higher levels
of antibodies that recognize these gluten by-products than blood taken from
healthy volunteers.
A final group of potential
culprits belongs to a diverse family of carbohydrates such as fructans that are
notorious for being difficult to digest. A failure to absorb these compounds
into the blood may draw excess water into the digestive tract and agitate its
resident bacteria. Because these resilient carbohydrates occur in all kinds of
food—not just grains—a gluten-free or wheat-free diet will not necessarily
solve anything if these molecules truly are to blame.
No Piece of Cake
Despite the recent evidence that wheat sensitivities are more numerous and
varied than previously realized, research has also revealed that many people
who think they have such reactions do not. In a 2010 study, only 12 of 32
individuals who said they felt better on a diet that excluded gluten or other
wheat proteins actually had an adverse reaction to those molecules. “Thus,
about 60 percent of the patients underwent an elimination diet without any real
reason,” notes study author Antonio Carroccio of the University of Palermo in Italy .
Nevertheless, uncovering
nongluten agitators of illness will give doctors a more precise way to diagnose
grain sensitivities and help people avoid certain foods. Researchers could, for
example, design blood tests to look for antibodies that bind to various short
chains of amino acids or proteins such as wheat germ agglutinin, explains
Umberto Volta, a gastroenterologist at the University of Bologna in Italy . And some scientists think ongoing
research will eventually yield new therapies. “If we know what triggers the
immune system, we hope we can switch the system off and cure the disease,” says
Roberto Chignola of the University of Verona in Italy .
Personally, I suspect that
something besides gluten might trigger my own symptoms. On occasion, I have
tried gluten-free grain-based products such as beer made from barley from which
the gluten has been extracted. Every time my headaches came roaring back with a
vengeance (far sooner than any hangover might have struck), making me all the
more suspicious that gluten is not the root of my troubles.
If that is true, and there
is even the remote possibility of safely reinstating gluten in my diet, I would
really like to know. As a New Yorker, it is hard for me to forgo pizza. If
gluten was vindicated in my case, perhaps I could add it to nongrain flours or
otherwise cook up experimental pizza at home and get those gooey, stretchy
slices out of my dreams and onto my plate.
This
article was originally published with the title "The Trouble with
Gluten."
Health Canada
Celiac
Disease
Celiac disease or
gluten-sensitive enteropathy is an inherited condition triggered by the
consumption of cereal grains containing "gluten". Simply put, the
immune system of a celiac reacts negatively to the presence of gluten in the
diet causing damage to the inner lining of the small bowel which reduces the
person's ablility to absorb nutrients including: iron, folate, calcium, Vitamin
D, protein, fat and other food compounds. The grains considered to be capable
of producing negative effects in individuals with celiac disease include the
different species of wheat (e.g., durum, spelt, kamut), barley, rye, and their
cross-bred hybrids (e.g., triticale, which is a cross between wheat and rye).
Currently the only treatment for celiac disease is to continually maintain a
strict gluten-free diet. This disease affects nearly 1% of the population.
Closely related family
members of celiacs have a greater risk of developing the disease. However, not
all individuals carrying the genes identified with this disease will develop
the disease. Therefore, other genetic and environmental factors have also been
implicated in its development.
The symptoms of celiac
disease vary greatly from one person to another both in extent and seriousness,
making diagnosis difficult. Infants and children more often display symptoms of
diarrhea and abnormal stretching of the abdomen. They could also show symptoms
of malnutrition such as short stature, anemia (weakness or low stamina),
defects in teething, failure to thrive, or in developmental delay. In adults,
gastrointestinal complaints are common and include abdominal pain, flatulence,
and diarrhea. Weight loss is most common, but symptoms of weight gain and
constipation are not unheard of. Only some individuals with celiac disease
suffer typical gastrointestinal symptoms, while others may display no visible
symptoms. Further symptoms vary and can include mouth ulcers, extreme fatigue,
bone pain and others. A serious skin condition (called dermatitis
herpetiformis) that results in an itchy rash with bumps and blisters is
sometimes a result of this disease. This condition is linked to gluten
sensitivity, and skin biopsy (sampling and testing) is usually performed to
confirm diagnosis.
Other conditions associated
with celiac disease include type 1 diabetes, down syndrome, thyroiditis,
arthritis, ataxia, depression, and neuropathy.
If celiac disease is
diagnosed early and treated with a gluten-free diet, the damaged tissues can
heal and the risk of developing many of the long term complications of this
disease, including osteoporosis (a weakening of the bones), lymphoma (tumors
arising in the lymph nodes), and infertility can be reduced.
Diagnosis
In recent years, an
improvement in the overall level of awareness about celiac disease and
associated conditions has allowed individuals and health professionals to
better suspect and screen for celiac disease. This is particularly true for
those groups at high risk.
Celiac disease can be
diagnosed through a combination of:
Blood tests
Small-bowel biopsy
Recovery from the symptoms while following a
gluten-free diet
Small-bowel biopsy remains
the 'gold standard' test for celiac disease detection. Testing for the disease
should take place before an individual starts a gluten-free diet, since removal
of gluten from the diet would interfere with a practitioner's ability to detect
the disease. After 6 to 12 months of maintaining a strict gluten-free diet,
symptoms should disappear, blood tests for the disease should become negative,
and any small bowel injury should heal completely. It will be important for
celiac patients to regularly follow up with their family doctor on their
progress in treating the disease.
For more information on celiac disease
Some of the hyperlinks
provided are to sites of organizations or other entities that are not subject
to the Official Languages Act .
The material found there is therefore in the language(s) used by the sites in
question.
Other Information
National Foundation for Celiac Awareness
Non-Celiac
Gluten Sensitivity
http://www.celiaccentral.org/non-celiac-gluten-sensitivity/
Your blood test for celiac disease came back negative. Now what?
If you have been suffering
symptoms that seem related to gluten, it may be possible that you have non-celiac gluten sensitivity .
Research estimates that 18
million Americans have non-celiac gluten sensitivity. That’s 6 times the amount
of Americans who have celiac disease.
Researchers are just
beginning to explore non-celiac gluten sensitivity, but we’d like to educate you
on what we’ve learned thus far. Follow NFCA as we present a series of Q&As
on non-celiac gluten sensitivity throughout 2012.
Includes answers to:
What is non-celiac gluten sensitivity?
What is an innate immune response?
What are the symptoms of non-celiac gluten
sensitivity?
If the symptoms are so similar, how is it
different from celiac disease?
Is non-celiac gluten sensitivity different
from a wheat allergy?
This Q&A was designed
to help you better understand non-celiac gluten sensitivity and what sets it
apart from celiac disease and wheat allergies.
What is non-celiac gluten sensitivity?
Non-celiac gluten
sensitivity has been coined to describe those individuals who cannot tolerate
gluten and experience symptoms similar to those with celiac disease but yet who
lack the same antibodies and intestinal damage as seen in celiac disease. Early
research suggests that non-celiac gluten sensitivity is an innate immune
response, as opposed to an adaptive immune response (such as autoimmune) or
allergic reaction.
OK, so what is an innate immune response?
Humans are born with an
innate immune system. An innate immune response is not antigen specific,
meaning that it is nonspecific as to the type of organism it fights. Although
its response is immediate against invading organisms, the innate immune
system does not have an immunological memory to invading organisms. Its
response is not directed towards self tissue, which would result in autoimmune
disease.
Unlike non-celiac gluten
sensitivity, celiac
disease is antigen specific (including tissue-transglutaminase,
endomysium and deamidated gliadin antibodies, and in some small children also
gliadin antibodies) and does result in an attack on its own tissue. Intestinal
damage, or enteropathy, is the direct result.
What are the symptoms of non-celiac gluten sensitivity?
Non-celiac gluten
sensitivity shares many symptoms with celiac disease. However, according to a collaborative
report published by Sapone et al. (2012), individuals with non-celiac
gluten sensitivity have a prevalence of extraintestinal or non-GI symptoms,
such as headache, “foggy mind,” joint pain, and numbness in the legs, arms or
fingers. Symptoms typically appear hours or days after gluten has been
ingested, a response typical for innate immune conditions like non-celiac
gluten sensitivity.
If the symptoms are so similar, how is it different from celiac disease?
Non-celiac gluten
sensitivity has been clinically recognized as less severe than celiac disease.
It is not accompanied by “the enteropathy, elevations in
tissue-transglutaminase, endomysium or deamidated gliadin antibodies, and
increased mucosal permeability that are characteristic of celiac disease”
(Ludvigsson et al, 2012). In other words, individuals with non-celiac gluten
sensitivity would not test positive for celiac disease based on blood testing,
nor do they have the same type of intestinal damage found in individuals with
celiac disease. Some individuals may experience minimal intestinal damage, and
this goes away with a gluten-free diet.
Research has also shown
that non-celiac gluten sensitivity does not result in the increased intestinal
permeability that is characteristic of celiac disease. Increased intestinal
permeability permits toxins, bacteria and undigested food proteins to seep
through the GI barrier and into the bloodstream, and research suggests that it
is an early biological change that comes before the onset of several
autoimmune diseases.
Is non-celiac gluten sensitivity different from a wheat allergy?
Yes. Allergies, including
those to wheat, are associated with positive IgE assays. Diagnosis is made
through skin prick tests, wheat-specific IgE blood testing and a food
challenge. Individuals who have gluten-related symptoms but test negative for a
wheat allergy may have non-celiac gluten sensitivity.
Related Content:
Includes answers to:
How can I get tested for non-celiac gluten
sensitivity?
I’m already gluten-free and I feel much better
than I did when eating gluten. Can I just assume that I have non-celiac
gluten sensitivity?
Are there any dangers to a false diagnosis of
non-celiac gluten sensitivity?
In matters of emerging
conditions like non-celiac gluten sensitivity, it’s best to go directly to the
physicians and scientists on the front lines of investigation. Last month NFCA
did just that.
During the May webcast “State of the Union: A Live Chat with Gluten-Related
Disorders Experts ,” Doctors Stefano Guandalini and Alessio
Fasano spoke openly about what we know and what we don’t know about non-celiac
gluten sensitivity, including the process of diagnosis. Notably, Dr. Guandalini
explained that a biological marker for non-celiac gluten sensitivity does not
currently exist and also spoke about the importance of a patient’s medical
history when considering this diagnosis.
For an explanation on where
the field stands with how this newly coined condition is diagnosed, listen to Dr.
Guandalini, beginning at minute marker 3:40. You can also read a transcript of this discussion , beginning on page 2.
After listening to Dr.
Guandalini, read the FAQs below for a further discussion on testing and
diagnosis of non-celiac gluten sensitivity.
How can I get
tested for non-celiac gluten sensitivity?
Currently, there are no
recommended methods to test for non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Some doctors
offer saliva, blood or stool testing. However, these tests have not been
validated and are therefore not accepted.
In NFCA’s webcast, Dr.
Guandalini states:
“As a matter of fact,
right now, they are to say that there is absolutely no biological readout that
is no way can this diagnosis can be supported by any laboratory investigation.
No antibodies in the blood are specific enough, or sensitive enough, for this
condition. No antibodies in the stools can be utilized to diagnose or screen
for this condition.”
Dr. Fasano also touched on
this topic and stated that his team is currently conducting research to
identify biomarkers that may help to test for and diagnose non-celiac gluten
sensitivity:
“…as Dr. Guandalini
explained when the only way to make a diagnosis of gluten sensitivity is by
exclusionary criteria since we do not have tests that will point in that
direction. And that’s where our current efforts are all about. Now that we
understand that it is a different entity we want to make sure that we can
eventually identify the biomarkers for this condition, and we’re doing a double
blind study to identify the biomarkers that will eventually fill the gap that
Dr. Guandalini was alluding to.”
For a recap of Dr. Fasano’s
discussion, begin listening
at minute marker 16:54. You can also read a transcript of this discussion , beginning on page 5.
So, how do I get
diagnosed?
Non-celiac gluten
sensitivity is diagnosed by process of exclusion. Experts recommend that you
first get tested for a wheat allergy and for celiac disease. If both of those
are negative, then your doctor may recommend a gluten elimination diet. If
symptoms improve on a gluten-free diet, then you likely have non-celiac gluten
sensitivity.
It is very important that a
knowledgeable physician oversee this entire process, which can help to omit
patients self-diagnosing themselves and to reduce the likelihood of a placebo
effect occurring during dietary intervention.
I’m already
gluten-free and I feel much better than I did when eating gluten. Can I just assume
that I have non-celiac gluten sensitivity?
It is possible that you
have celiac disease and not non-celiac gluten sensitivity. But because celiac
disease is a lifelong condition requiring strict adherence to a gluten-free
diet and proper management by a knowledgeable physician, it is important that
an accurate diagnosis is made. Additionally, if you have celiac disease,
it is important to confirm the diagnosis, as your family members could be at
risk for the disease and may not know it.
One option is to talk to
your doctor about genetic testing for celiac disease. A negative gene test
would rule out celiac disease, but a positive gene test may mean that more
testing is needed. Another option is to talk to your doctor about possibly
going back on a gluten-containing diet for a period of time in order to confirm
whether or not you have celiac disease, a wheat allergy, or non-celiac gluten
sensitivity.
Most importantly, you should
always remember to talk to your doctor about your symptoms and health concerns
before beginning treatment of any kind on your own. Starting a gluten-free diet
before being properly tested can complicate the diagnostic process. A
knowledgeable healthcare provider will be able to help navigate the testing for
and diagnosis of a gluten-related disorder.
Are there any
dangers to a false diagnosis of non-celiac gluten sensitivity?
The below response
comes from Daniel Leffler, MD, MS, Director of Clinical Research, The Celiac
Center at BIDMC, Director of Quality Assurance, Division of Gastroenterology,
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center following the December 2012 webinar,
"You Ask, We Answer: 60 Minutes with Top Celiac Disease
Researchers ."
Since the only treatment
for NCGS is a gluten-free diet, as long as you receive proper nutritional
counseling and keep a healthy balanced diet, there is no danger to this treatment.
However, it is important to recognize that many gastrointestinal diseases
present with similar symptoms, so the real danger is that in assuming a person
has NCGS, they are not evaluated appropriately and a more serious illness is
missed and allowed to progress untreated.
Includes answers to:
Does having a family member with celiac
disease make you more susceptible to non-celiac gluten sensitivity?
If I have non-celiac gluten sensitivity now,
does that mean I would develop celiac disease if I continued to eat
gluten?
Are there any conditions that appear to be
related to non-celiac gluten sensitivity?
There are a lot of
unanswered questions about non-celiac gluten sensitivity, so we contacted
Stefano Guandalini, MD, Medical Director for the University of Chicago Celiac Disease Center , to tell us what early research has
or has not uncovered about this condition.
Does having a family member with celiac
disease make you more susceptible to non-celiac gluten sensitivity?
Although there are no
published data yet, the experience of many of those who work on celiac disease
is that indeed there appear to be clusters of cases of non-celiac gluten
sensitivity and celiac disease in the same families. My experience is the same.
If I have non-celiac gluten sensitivity now,
does that mean I would develop celiac disease if I continued to eat gluten?
We really don't have data
to answer that. Once we know exactly what triggers non-celiac gluten
sensitivity, we'll be able to answer that question. A helpful thing however
would be to get tested for the celiac genes: if absent - while you certainly
may still be gluten sensitive - you won't stand a chance of becoming
celiac.
Are there any conditions that appear to be
related to non-celiac gluten sensitivity?
We simply don't know enough
about non-celiac gluten sensitivity to answer that. So far, the only known
symptoms/signs associated (in addition to IBS-like ones) are fatigue, headaches
and "foggy mind".
Includes answers to:
Does having non-celiac gluten sensitivity
increase your risk of developing other autoimmune disorders?
We know that peripheral neuropathy can be
associated with celiac disease. Is there a similar relationship between
non-celiac gluten sensitivity and other neurological conditions?
When will we know more about the long-term
complications of non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS)?
Autoimmune and
Neurological Conditions
Research has found that
celiac disease is associated with other autoimmune disorders and neurological
conditions like headaches and peripheral neuropathy. When it comes to
non-celiac gluten sensitivity, very little is known about if and how it may
relate to these conditions.
During NFCA’s webinar “You
Ask, We Answer: 60 Minutes with Top Celiac Disease Researchers ,” the expert
panelists provided an update on what we do and do not know about non-celiac
gluten sensitivity, and what they expect research to uncover. The responses
below have been either transcribed from statements by Dan Leffler, MD, MS, of
the Celiac Center at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston , and Joseph Murray, MD, of the Mayo
Clinic in Rochester , MN or responded to following the
webinar, as there were unanswered questions during the live programming
due to a lack of time. This is indicated in each question.
Does having
non-celiac gluten sensitivity increase your risk of developing other autoimmune
disorders?
Dr. Leffler: (transcribed)
We don’t know 100%, but I would say that the fact that it doesn’t
appear to share the genetic predisposition for celiac disease (that HLA-DQ2 and
DQ8 which seem to be autoimmune predisposing), suggests that [non-celiac gluten
sensitivity] is not likely to be as associated, if at all, with other
autoimmune conditions. And I think, again, there’s been very little work done in
this area, but the little work that has been done sort of suggests this as well
– that there’s not an increased risk of autoimmune diseases in the non-celiac
gluten sensitivity picture, but I think that clearly this is still a work in
progress.
[During the webinar, a
spot poll revealed that 8% of attendees reported having non-celiac gluten
sensitivity and an autoimmune disorder. Dr. Leffler was asked to address this.] Dr. Leffler: Autoimmune conditions of various
sorts are pretty common in the general population, thyroid disease being the
most common. But if you add them all up, 5-10% of the general population will
have some autoimmune disease, so the 8% of people in the audience with
non-celiac gluten sensitivity really is about population level.
We know that
peripheral neuropathy can be associated with celiac disease. Is there a similar
relationship between non-celiac gluten sensitivity and other neurological
conditions?
Dr. Leffler: (transcribed) In terms of the other gluten-related
disorders, especially gluten sensitivity and peripheral neuropathy, I think
that’s just a complete black box. We don’t really know anything about if or how
gluten sensitivity may be related to neurological manifestations.
Dr. Murray: (transcribed) Non-celiac gluten sensitivity and
its relationship to these other entities is I would say scientifically unproven
though highly suspected. Gluten ataxia could be one where there’s a
little more data to support than the others, though I think as Dr. Leffler
pointed out, we don’t know what the nature of the association is. And by
association doesn’t imply causation. It could easily be that someone has an
injury to their brain or immune system may see that react in a way that looks
like a reaction to gluten, but it may not be primarily caused by gluten. So
these are very difficult issues.
The question was
answered via e-mail to address the remaining questions from the live webinar
airing.
When will we know
more about the long-term complications of non-celiac gluten sensitivity?
Dr. Leffler: (post
webinar) Since non-celiac gluten sensitivity only began being
diagnosed recently, and there are no blood tests for this condition, it is
impossible to look at people who had this condition many years ago, as we can
with celiac disease. This means that it will take many more years before
we are likely to have good data on long-term complications of non-celiac gluten
sensitivity. On the other hand, in most other conditions including celiac
disease and inflammatory bowel disease, long term complications are linked to a
degree of inflammation. Since there appears to be minimal if any inflammation
in non-celiac gluten sensitivity, it is likely that long-term complications are
minimal as well.
Visit NFCA’s
Webinar Archives to listen to the full recording.
A couple more sources worth
investigating….
Sollid, L.M., J. Kolberg, H. Scott,
J. Ek, O. Fausa, P. Brandtzaeg. “Antibodies to Wheat Germ Agglutinin in Coeliac
Disease.” Clinical & Experimental Immunol ogy Hoboken : Wiley-Blackwell Publishing
1986. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1577348/ .
(November 2012).
MacLean's Magazine:
The dangers of going gluten-free
It’s the biggest health craze of our time, though some doctors
fear it’s creating real problems. (Even the Wheat Belly guru is
worried)
Liam Mogan
The first time Margaret Dron organized the Gluten Free Expo
early last year, it was inside the gymnasium of a small community
centre in east Vancouver. She had recruited one volunteer, two speakers,
38 vendors and expected 500 attendees. There was no entrance
fee—instead, people were to bring gluten-free goods for the local food
bank; three boxes were set aside for the collection. Six hours later,
more than 3,000 people had turned out, and the volunteer had to call a
one-tonne truck to pick up the donations. In one Sunday afternoon, Dron
realized, “there is some serious potential here. So I quit everything I
had, got an extension on my mortgage, and just dove in.” Since then, “it
has blown up.”
That is to say, the Gluten Free Expo is now an annual affair in
Toronto and Calgary, besides Vancouver. Next year, Edmonton and Ottawa
will join the roster. About 10,000 people attend each weekend-long
event, which is usually held inside a 60,000-sq.-foot convention centre.
“And that’s getting tight,” says Dron. More than 200 vendors sell their
offerings, mostly food items but also skin-care products and
nutritional supplements—all made without gluten, a protein found in
wheat, barley and rye, and blamed for many digestive problems. Food
donations are still accepted, but a $12 to $15 entrance fee has been
implemented. “It’s gone from me begging [for] volunteer speakers to
chefs and authors from all over North America requesting to come out,”
says Dron. “It’s amazing.”
“Amazing” meaning lucrative, of course. Gluten-free products are a
$90-million enterprise in Canada alone, and the sector is expected to
grow at least 10 per cent each year through to 2018—an astounding feat
for what is primarily a food-based category. In the United States, the
market is valued at $4.2 billion and climbing. A landmark study by
researchers at Dalhousie University in Halifax, published in the Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
in 2008, revealed that gluten-free foods were, on average, 242 per cent
more expensive than their “regular” counterparts, and up to 455 per
cent pricier in some cases. “If I was to manufacture a product,” says
Dron, “there is no way that I would not have a gluten-free option in
today’s day and age.”
Manufacturers are getting the message—and not just small fringe
businesses, but behemoth multinational corporations, too. Kellogg’s
revamped its Rice Krispies recipe, first concocted in 1927, by removing
barley malt (the source of gluten in the original) from its gluten-free
version so it could advertise as a cereal “that’s easy for kids to
digest.” Campbell Company of Canada claims to be the “first mainstream
brand” to feature a gluten-free symbol on its soups and chilies. Tim
Hortons hailed the introduction of a gluten-free menu item in mid-July—a
chewy coconut macaroon drizzled with milk chocolate—as nothing short of
a “defining moment in our Canadian dining history.” Wal-Mart Canada
started selling gluten-free goods online this summer and offers free
shipping no matter the order size. “They want to be the Amazon.com of
gluten-free,” says communications specialist Tricia Ryan, who founded
the Gluten-Free Agency in Toronto last August to help companies market their new products.
Business is booming for her, too, as the variety of products expands
far beyond the oxymoronic “gluten-free pasta” and “gluten-free bread”
lines. Items that consumers might never even think of as containing
gluten are being tweaked, or at least rebranded, to meet the demand: soy
sauce, salad dressings, potato chips, hot dogs, veggie burgers,
licorice, pickles, spices, beer, vodka, toothpaste, makeup, protein
powders, medicine, even playdough. Indeed, nothing is so sacred it can’t
be reworked. Canadian churches can now purchase gluten-free or
low-gluten Eucharistic wafers: $22.95 for 100 pieces.
With all these products, one might assume the need for gluten-free
items is epidemic in Canada, that without them a public health crisis
could emerge. In reality, the explanation for the recent explosion in
demand is a spectacular mix of real medical concerns, changing views on
what accounts for a healthy diet, savvy marketing and celebrity
influence. Sports stars Steve Nash and Novak Djokovic
insist going gluten-free has turned them into the finest and leanest
athletes in the world. Public health messages have shifted focus from
low fat and sugar-free to low-carb, partly to stave off rampant obesity.
And the best-selling book Wheat Belly ,
by American cardiologist William Davis, published in 2011, has
convinced millions to stop eating, as the author puts it, “a perfectly
crafted Frankengrain” that “has exerted more harm than any foreign
terrorist group can inflict on us.”
In the midst of this frenzy, it’s easy to forget the fact that only a
tiny segment of the Canadian population is strictly prohibited from
eating wheat by medical professionals—the roughly 35,000 people
diagnosed with celiac disease. Another 300,000 are believed to be
afflicted but undiagnosed. Their plight is severe: Just one bite of a
glutenous food damages their small intestine and can cause a range of
symptoms including abdominal pain, gas, bloating, diarrhea and
constipation. The disease can lead to problems including “osteoporosis,
anemia, sterility, even carcinoma,” says Peter Taylor, executive
director of the Canadian Celiac Association . For them, “every day, every meal, every mouthful” is a matter of sickness or health.
But they are a small lot, certainly “not enough to make a business,”
says Ryan. Rather, it appears that the gluten-free craze is being
fuelled by the dietary choices of a much larger group of individuals
known as “gluten avoiders”—seven million strong in Canada alone, the
majority of whom do not have celiac disease or any other medically
prescribed reason for eliminating gluten from their diet. Many say they
experience gut problems, but their doctors can’t explain why or what to
do about it. Some of these individuals turn to blogs and books for
guidance on how to go gluten-free. In the process, they may learn of
other rumoured benefits: weight loss, chief among them. They share their
story with family, friends and co-workers, who in turn try going
gluten-free, too. It’s for this crowd that the market grows. The gluten
avoider group “is the driver for the gluten-free category,” says Ryan.
“It’s the one that substantiates businesses making [these products].”
It’s also the segment of the population that has an increasing number
of doctors across Canada confused and worried about the possible
dangers of patients going gluten-free without talking to a health
professional first. Gluten avoiders may spend money on foods that they
don’t really need to eat, that may actually be lacking nutrition and
causing them other problems. They may also miss out on important
diagnoses, especially if they do have celiac disease and aren’t tested.
All this has led doctors to debate in the pages of scientific journals
and even out loud: Is Canada facing a new medical emergency about which
little is yet understood or is this just the latest health fad gone
wild? And most importantly, are gluten avoiders doing themselves more
harm than good?
Long before he became the head of the celiac association, Peter
Taylor knew all about the torture that gut problems could inflict. For
five years, he suffered seemingly inexplicable bowel pain and a terrible
skin rash, which he could not cure. He lost 40 lb., because, Taylor
later realized, his body couldn’t process his “carb-rich diet.” When his
family physician learned of his symptoms, an assortment of possible
causes was considered, including irritable bowel syndrome, gall bladder
trouble and an ulcer. It wasn’t until a year and a half later that
celiac disease came up, and was finally diagnosed. (It’s done using a
simple blood test; if a particular antibody is detected, a biopsy is
done to confirm bowel damage. This is covered in every province, except
Ontario, where the blood work costs about $120.) Within three months of
eliminating gluten, his symptoms disappeared. “The irony,” says Taylor,
recalling his frustration at how long it took to figure out, “is that my
doctor at the time was a celiac.”
However vexed Taylor felt, his experience was resolved pretty quickly
by comparison: It takes, on average, a stunning 12 years for patients
to be diagnosed with celiac disease from when they first start feeling
sick, according to a study in a recent issue of the Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology .
That’s largely because the symptoms are so ubiquitous they could hint
at any number of disorders. “Gut problems are actually the most common
symptoms the population has,” says Mohsin Rashid, a pediatric
gastroenterologist and professor at Dalhousie, who co-authored the
gluten-free cost comparison study. “That’s why celiac disease is
underdiagnosed,” adds Taylor. “It’s masked by the perception that it’s
something else.” In fact, “essentially two out of three Canadians every
year will have some sort of digestive problem,” says Catherine Mulvale,
executive director of the Canadian Digestive Health Foundation , and many don’t know what’s wrong. “Because they can’t get answers, they are scared.”
In the absence of a definitive diagnosis from their doctors, these
individuals invariably take matters into their own hands. That usually
involves cutting out foods that have been popularly vilified—especially
grains. Often, people perceive an improvement in their symptoms, says
Rashid, and return to the doctor’s office to confirm that gluten is the
problem. Except now, diagnosing celiac disease is all but impossible: A
patient must consume gluten every day for at least a couple of months or
even up to a year before getting tested. As such, some people are
wrongly informed that they don’t have the disease. Others refuse to
start eating gluten again so they can be tested accurately—they feel
their personal experiment is evidence enough of a gluten problem.
“That’s a big pitfall,” says Rashid. “All gastroenterologists are seeing
this phenomenon, and family doctors too.”
This disconnect between doctors and patients about who should go
gluten-free and when prompted a sharply worded article in the April
issue of the B.C. Medical Journal entitled, “Gluten elimination diets: facts for patients on this food fad .”
Co-authors Kathleen Cadenhead and Margo Sweeny, both Vancouver
physicians and members of the British Columbia Medical Association’s
nutrition committee, note that, “Wheat, and gluten in particular, has
been given pariah status by the millions who are on the low-carb diet
bandwagon, particularly those who believe they are allergic or sensitive
to gluten.” But, they insist that “there is no need for patients to
avoid gluten” or wheat unless they’ve been diagnosed with celiac disease
or an allergy because, the doctors argue, “most of the evidence against
wheat or gluten is unsubstantiated by science.”
The article ignited a fiery debate. “I did push some buttons in
writing this,” admits Cadenhead, but “we were trying not to be
wishy-washy and say, ‘Look . . . the evidence is not there yet.’ ”
Specifically, when it comes to a new medical phenomenon that’s being
called “non-celiac disease gluten intolerance” or gluten sensitivity.
Within the last five years or so, a handful of studies have proposed the
emergence of this condition, which may affect as many as two million
Canadians. They are thought to experience the same symptoms as celiacs
after eating gluten. The trouble is diagnosing it; to date, there is no
test that can detect gluten sensitivity. Rather, patients may consider
themselves to have the condition if they have tested negative for celiac
disease or a wheat allergy, or if they simply “feel better” or
symptom-free when they don’t eat gluten.
Given how little is understood about gluten sensitivity, many doctors
are hesitant to bring it up with patients, and some even question
whether the condition is real. “We are describing a disease that is new
altogether. It’s very difficult,” says Rashid. “We don’t know whether
it’s a permanent thing; maybe it’s transient. Maybe it’s a dose-related
phenomenon, [so] you can take some gluten. [There are] a lot of
unknowns.” There is even suspicion that a “placebo effect” may be at
play, adds Vincci Tsui , a
registered dietitian in Calgary. “Because when people do switch over to a
gluten-free diet, a lot of times it does mean eliminating fast foods,
processed foods, refined grains, or it means cooking at home more often,
eating more vegetables and fruits,” she explains. “They feel better and
they think it is the [avoidance of] gluten when really it may be the
fact that they are eating better in general.”
The notion that gluten avoiders are eating more whole foods and
cooking healthy meals is really a best-case scenario, though. Many
medical professionals are actually seeing eating habits take a turn for
the worse once individuals avoid gluten. That’s because they are relying
on processed gluten-free foods that often lack important vitamins,
minerals and fibre, and are made with substitute starches such as rice
and tapioca flour that “really have no nutritional value at all,” says
Dron. “But they have really high glycemic indices.” In fact, a
forthcoming study examining the nutritional content of gluten-free foods
by Rashid found that these products may be higher in fat and lower in
protein than their “regular” counterparts. “We have a tendency to think
that gluten-free is healthier,” says Meghan Walker, a naturopathic
doctor in Toronto. “And that is certainly not the case.” In fact, “a lot
of people put on weight when they go on a gluten-free diet,” says
Rashid.
Further complicating matters is the fact that “most people who think
they’re on a gluten-free diet aren’t, unless they’ve really done their
research,” says Cadenhead. “If they’re just avoiding pasta and bread,”
that’s not enough. “Gluten is in almost everything.” It may be used as a
thickener or stabilizer in soups, spreads and sauces, for flavouring in
cereals or noodles, spices, teas and coffees, or as filler in processed
meats, imitation seafood or vegetarian substitutes. Reading labels may
not always make the presence of gluten obvious, either. It may appear in
Latin as triticum vulgare or hordeum vulgare or secale cereale .
Or the label may feature ingredients that people don’t realize contain
gluten, including bulgur, couscous, farina, malt and seitan. Gluten “can
be modified to give you all kinds of different properties,” explains Ravindra Chibbar ,
Canada Research chair in crop quality and a professor at the University
of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon. “It is a readily available, inexpensive
component and industry want to get their money’s worth. That is why
people are working to get more and more products out of gluten
components.”
That makes good business sense, of course. But it may not serve
customers so well—those who don’t realize that they’re consuming gluten,
or those who are buying gluten-free foods that are poor substitutes.
The whole situation makes doctors such as Cadenhead shudder. “Whenever
you see nutritional issues being heavily marketed, it makes me want to
protect people from being ripped off,” says Cadenhead. “I would like
people to be obtaining the best nutritional value for their food
dollar.” Unbeknownst to many gluten avoiders, that may not be happening.
One of the most baffling aspects of the gluten-free phenomenon is how
much influence a singular book has had on the diets of so many people. Wheat Belly
has been heavily criticized by scores of physicians and lauded by many,
many more gluten avoiders as proof their dietary restraint is
justified. The irony, however, is that William Davis detests his
new-found role as poster boy for the gluten-free food industry—and
actually discourages people from buying these products because of their
low nutritional value. “This has nothing to do with gluten,” he tells Maclean’s .
Instead, he takes issue with how wheat has been grown, and altered
through hybridizations over the last several decades, which he believes
is harmful to human health. “If we view wheat as nothing more than a
vehicle for gluten we are not going to understand all the issues that
are important about modern wheat.”
It’s a highly inflammatory view, and crop experts such as Chibbar
insist it is without merit. Hybridization means “you take one plant that
has a feature you like, you cross it with another one and you get a
progeny that has characteristics that you want,” he explains. “It has
been going on for tens of thousands of years. It happens with all the
crops, it’s not just wheat.” Others, such as Earl Geddes, CEO of the Canadian International Grains Institute ,
argue that consumers are missing the real problem with the country’s
food supply: “Here in Canada we go to the grocery store once a week and
we want to buy something that will sit in our cupboard for a week and
still be good,” he says. “That’s got nothing to do with the wheat that’s
in the product. That’s all the other stuff that we as consumers have
insisted gets put into the product.”
While experts debate to what extent the war on wheat is warranted,
millions of Canadians are struggling with debilitating gastrointestinal
symptoms. Whatever the cause, their pain can’t be ignored or downplayed,
says naturopath Walker. “If people articulate that they don’t feel well
on a type of food and that is dismissed, I think there is a real danger
that they will wind up with chronic issues,” she says.
But there are signs that the situation may be improving for gluten
avoiders. Dron notes that an increasing number of manufacturers have
heeded calls for healthier gluten-free options, and are launching
nutrient-rich products such as quinoa pasta. And at an international
celiac symposium in Chicago in September, Rashid will present his latest
cost-comparison study, which shows that gluten-free foods are
equalizing in price with regular foods—they are now 162 per cent more
expensive, on average, rather than 242 per cent. He believes more
competition in the market has driven down cost.
In this way, the more gluten avoiders demand information and options
for themselves from doctors and manufacturers, the better their
prospects for a healthy future. It just won’t happen overnight. “All
kind of questions are coming about for which we really don’t have good
answers,” says Rashid. “Our problem is people going [gluten-free]
without being properly counselled or checked out. It becomes
problematic.” He wants patients to request celiac testing before
starting this new diet. “It will take some time to sort this out,” he
acknowledges, and sometimes “patients can’t wait. They want to get
better.” But they may, in fact, make matters worse.A brief biography:
Dr. Wayne Coghlan, Collingwood Chiropractor
Wayne Coghlan : A
graduate of the University of Guelph School of Human Biology, and the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College . I have further education in Sports
Sciences, and completed a Master's degree in Counselling Psychology. Played
varsity sports – rugby and football. Worked my way through school doing
physical labour ... I know the realities of the work place. Gardening, canoe
trips, being a good parent and member of our community.
Questions/Comments/To book
and appoint:
or
call me at 705 445-5401
Links:
http://drwaynecoghlan.blogspot.ca/
Supplementary links: